The sickness. The turning of a gender into an offense. The shaming of a gender.

This is what pornography does. It makes a gender offensive. It makes that gender something to shame or be ashamed of. sadly, overwhelmingly by virtue of the genitalia, the woman in heterosexual porn more specifically, has agreed to rape- a rape that she enjoys- the purpose of these scenarios that we see primarily, is to completely magnify, glorify, the man’s genitalia, in a way that gives power, such as, the woman afterwards treating the penis as though it as done a good job etc- the purpose is to make him feel like the king, but why should i say king and not queen? is king more dominating than queen? you see, none of the terms we use for gender that are meant to be equal make sense anyway, if they truly are equal- we don’t say, that in porn, when she is placing her protruding genital into him, that it makes her the queen- we always somehow defer to the male title- you see the woman in porn is not awake- she is not aware- it not much different from a woman murdering someone in cold blood, or a mass murderer- they are disengaged
i saw a quote tonight that said people will accept seeing writings or tv shows of an axe going into someone’s skull, but when detailed sexual acts are written out or portrayed on tv, people write in and say i will never watch your show again- well, the truth is, both are equally evil and disgusting BUT we must think of it like this- WHICH of the 2, if a child, if a sensitive person who knows it’s wrong etc, watches it, has the likelihood of distorting the person’s image of their own body? our BODY. our BODY is our first boundary given to us by God, and more specifically, our skin. there is a RIGHT way to use the body, and these people are not in the right, not when it’s casually yet detailed in its showing on a popular tv show, a woman getting it in the behind, etc. Never. But, it points to something, doesn’t it? That people can live and NOT be AWAKE to things, yes? Which only further proves that there is an objective truth. Just as I wrote before, that when a person commits murder in cold blood, they aren’t even awake, really, even if premeditated. It is no different from the sex in porn that the disjointed pair are partaking of.

She was the Mozart to my Salieri…

So, as many of you know, I had been in a loving relationship with a woman, younger than myself, this past year. She was a woman who dealt with, was created with what the world has decided to call, Asperger’s Syndrome. She was one of the most gentle souls I had ever met, and a great comfort to me, and a joy to my heart.

Courtney is a childlike, innocent spirit, and I knew, and I felt how much she loved me, and the feeling was mutual. There was something else I knew about her: that she was a genius. A genius in SOME respects, yes, and this is what I’m trying to aim for in this article. A person recently said to me, were you Salieri, to her Mozart? Ha. We are both artists, and the things she could create, I was blown away by. How she could sew and what she did sew, her work with duct tape, and then seeing her little laboratory in her mother’s basement, and the things, the work masks, chemicals that were down there, all for these tasks, that one usually wouldn’t associate with genius… nor with sewing! Let me also point out, that Courtney herself never referred to herself as a genius. She also possessed a level of depth of understanding of the human person, quite similar to myself and my close friends, and so I believe that had she had more formation and a good foundation, she would be brilliant in this area, and could understand just as much as my friends and myself do, because you see, much of what they excel in, and proclaim to be geniuses in, are at surface level. But, Courtney had another layer to her, whether she knew it or not. And so, this idea of missing that “good foundation” that would have made her a genius in the understanding of the human person, helps to show me the reality of universal and objective truth.
Courtney, being very young and still grappling with her emotions and how to deal with teh negativity she felt being seen as a person “who HAS” Asperger’s, along with some of my own neurotic behavior, and living in a world where really parents just encourage their children, in spite of their emotional circumstance to date, all helped our relationship to break down. And so I admit, that I played my part, and that the reality is, I should have shown first and foremost that I was her friend, not her partner. She does not really have any friends at all.

So, what I really want to get into here, is the concept of genius, and even just the usage of the word, and how it is thrown around. When I say it about Courtney, I am sincere in saying so and I am not using it loosely, and not using in a way to lift her up above myself or anyone, false worship, etc. But after our ending, I joined an Asperger’s support group, because she had so moved me to the cause, softened my heart, and I felt that many people in her position felt and struggled as she did. What I found instead in this group on Facebook, were people mostly complaining about quirks that were really OCD in nature that anyone including myself, could suffer from, and people flippantly stating in many of the posts how they were made fun of in school but “too bad now, because it turned out I was a genius all along…”. Things like that. I have OCD as well, and used to have it to a gargantuan extent, and I trip over my words and stutter if I’m not properly medicated etc; I just want to make that clear for people, that I have dealt with similar struggles, and not only did Courtney open my eyes and heart to this community, but I saw that I had things in common with them. I recall driving around with her, and everywhere we stopped, when she got out of the car, and she would have to open her trunk to make sure her laptop was still there. When coming back to the car, she would do the same thing.

Now, some of you may know, that people with Asperger’s, first of all, the thing has many layers to it, and so the problem with anyone and everyone who believes they have some kind of “syndrome” or “disorder”, is that they will point out symptoms that they have, that really, could not have anything to do with having the actual syndrome they have, as they are symptoms that I myself experience, etc. But, in any case, many people who experience Asperger’s cannot look you in the eye for very long, and that is a neurological issue. Also, many of them stutter and trip over their words, and cannot speak clearly and slowly, even with much, much therapy and “training”, as Courtney had gone through.

So, before I even met Courtney, that same year, I met a young man who was severely Autistic and was my age; he was a thinker like me, and exceedingly sweet in spirit. Then, Courtney came along, and, while knowing Courtney, another good young person came into my life, who believes himself to be on the spectrum at some level. All 3 of these people, very different, in their spirit, their nature; just plain gentle. Months later, after losing my Courtney, I was compelled to join that Asperger’s support group. Now sadly, hear what happened. Two nights ago I wrote a post, meant in all seriousness, in which I said “Wow. So many people on here call themselves geniuses, I have noticed. I know myself to be an intellectual genius, so is it ok for me to walk around telling people that?”. I wrote it to make people think (as always), and I seriously meant it, as well. Some people liked what I wrote, others really took offense. Many said to me “What is wrong with being really good at something and telling people about it, and thus finding the silver-lining in our having Asperger’s? Since you do not have it, it would come across as pompous of you to tell people you are a genius”. I said to her “Then that you are admitting that your Asperger’s “gives you” your genius, am I correct?” Before long, as these “conversations” on my post progressed, I found myself kicked out of the group, and entirely blocked. I can no longer find the group at all.

Genius. Who is a genius? What is one? What is genius versus brilliance? I have always been told that I am brilliant. So has my father. There is no test capable of measuring one’s “genius”. It just isn’t reality and isn’t true. Brilliance is a concept that is more accessible, and I believe, less aloof, and just plain realistic. I am very good at certain things, and therefore I have been called brilliant. This is absolutely no different from these people with Asperger’s. In life, this is how it is: we are al good at SOMETHING, there’s always at least one thing, that we shine in, so we are all brilliant in our own way. So, what I got from the Asperger’s group is sadly that, while these people are most likely gentle in spirit, as this seems to be their nature, they are still in a box, and they are part of a group. They may feel like outcasts, like they do not fit in, but there certainly is a place for them. And what I also realized is, is that it made me struggle with conceiving whether Asperger’s and autism then, are really things that are PART of you, some kind of thing latched onto you because of genetics, or is it just part of being created in a beautiful way? I was created in a beautiful different way apart from Courtney, and she was as well, from me. I believe that in them proclaiming themselves to be geniuses, they are essentially saying that it is their “disorder” that makes them geniuses. But as I was saying, I am sorry, but reality is that a test, a “syndrome” etc, none of that makes you a genius. You are who and what you are, and if you happen to be that, that is what you are; it is not because of a disorder you have, or what have you. Someone on the thread even said openly, I think out of insecurity, many of us call ourselves geniuses, and I believe that to be completely the truth about it. Perhaps yes, Asperger’s may help certain things come more easily and natural to a person, but that is not what gives them their genius, nor does it give you a free pass to being a genius. What I also got from this group, is that this word and concept, just as I am doing so now in this article, is being used and tossed around rather flippantly, carelessly. And it is a shame. And it is a shame that they believe their “syndrome” causes them to be as they are. This is not what Courtney was about, or wanted, or felt.

What I had always wanted to say to Courtney, as she struggled feeling like she did not belong, was: “Everyone is different. You are the same as everyone else, you’re not different, but we’re all different in our own way still, and your kind of different, i know makes you uncomfortable. I just want to try to help you be comfortable in who you are”.
So, as you can see, this group and being thrown out left me at a cross-roads and triggered many things. I felt a double-whammy: I felt now, maybe Asperger’s IS a thing, not just part of their creation, and look at what these seemingly “gentle” people did to me; and on top of that, Asperger’s got in the way of Courtney and I being together. Again, I will say, I realize that, they may feel apart from people, but they ARE in a box, like everyone else, they ARE a group. They are SO much a group, that they can throw someone out. And their being gentle by nature, no longer know if it is truly who they are, or if it is given to them in their Autism, just as their supposed “genius”. I don’t even know if I am expressing this correctly, in a way that one can understand. I just know, that the people I have known in person, are the gentle and kind ones. My one friend who suspects he is on the spectrum even jokingly said to me “What happened? Did you accidently sense feelings, and thus broke the rules?”. I am Catholic, I am gay, I am transgendered. I am pro-life, and I am against birth-control. There isn’t a single group or box that exists that I can crawl into and be part of, that is like me entirely, and can throw others out. I have my few close friends who are not like me but totally accept me. And so I suppose THAT is where I am meant to be. I am not meant for a “group”, it seems.

Again, I proffer them the idea to look at themselves, and just put it in perspective, which I do not think they do. I thought there was a group of humble, gentle spirits out there, but the way they behaved, made me feel that they really are just a “syndrome”. If they could think of what they excel in and just think “I’m brillliant at this”, or, “I’m really good at this”, just as most people do… So, as you can see, in the end, I am currently left feeling disenchanted, and disheartened. And, I do not like to speak in terms of “them versus us”, but for what happened last night and the sake of ease in discussion in this article, I am just a little bit. My close friend pointed out to me last night, clearly, these people who kicked you out, much like Courtney, are not in a position to understand you and us, and many of us do not understand them.”. But, I do understand them. What it made me think is, are some people with Asperger’s, aer they just by nature a different creation, the ones who are so gentle, like the people I have known, and do others, possess this sweetness, but also have this added layer of not being able to understand us to the point that it would lead them to be so unkind to someone else. Especially someone who repeatedly said I meant no offense, and there was no offense intended in my statement. Through that, I can see and believe that yes, many of them cannot process feelings in the same way. It isn not that they are not there, and that they don’t get crushed in the same way as I do, but they react differently. Such as, Courtney could be hurt and still plow away and focus on whatever she is doing, and come out with it brilliantly. Myself, I will be crushed and lose focus, and come to a standstill for a while. Again, we should not simply however, just attribute these things to having or not having Asperger’s and so on. Everyone is just made up of so many layers, and it is these plus past experiences, that lead up to all these things.

Thank you for caring to read this matter, close to my heart. Interesting how last year was the “Year of the Autistic person”, for me. Just as in my last post, Chuck and Buck, all this brought to light for me, how it is not enough, and sometimes it fails, to merely label things, people, their behaviors. It is not enough to say “I am a genius because I have Asperger’s”. It is not enough to say “He must be bisexual in some way, because as a child, he enjoyed sexual activity with another boy”. I find that in certain areas, when we do this, those words are like cement walls. And what are words? They are just words.

Just when it seems like I’m going to wrap up the article, I have yet something else to say. The whole experience just made me realize that, while people may feel different, and be part of a group that is different, they are still in a box and want to be there. What I wrote on that group’s page was nothing meant to be argumentative, and so it made me realize, that it is not worth my time and energy; they are where they are, and so what I wrote and how they reacted, is not my issue and not anything to truly be hampered by. They want to be where they are, it seems. I notice now that sometimes, people’s negative reactions towards you can bring a quick closure.

Chuck & Buck

buckI haven’t written about a film in a while, and this weekend I was inspired to finally write about this film, called Chuck and Buck. Somehow, it suddenly made my way back into my head over this past weekend; it is a film I saw a couple years back with a former partner of mine, at the MOMA. Iy is in fact a “gay” film (sort of), or rather, it will be seen as such in the eyes of many, should you choose to ever watch it. As I think of it, and I think it struck me then, too, it was interesting to watch a movie IN NYC, that was made in 2000, prior to 9/11, let alone an art house “gay” film.

In this review, I seek to point out some flaws in the way we as humans tend to want to condense things. The film revolves around Buck, who is most likely a person somewhere on the autistic spectrum. Sadly, if you read other reviews of the film, he is referred to as a “man-child”, which does not give the character justice, and which I cannot stand. He is childlike, but also rather indifferent, which takes away from some qualities of that which is childlike. Then, there is Chuck, now Charlie, his best friend from childhood. Throughout the film, we are not quite given the full picture of either character’s backgrounds, other than they were super tight, and… you can probably begin deducing already. Both men are in their 20s. Now, pay attention, because some of what I just said will tie in with another post I shall be writing later.

At the start of the film, childlike Buck, about 27 and living with his sickly mother, discovers her dead in one of the rooms of the house. This jumpstarts the whole “Chuck effect”, him being back in the picture, when he flies back to their childhood town for the funeral, and the 2 former besties reunite for the first time, after Chuck had moved away when they were still youth. Almost from the start, it is evident that Buck pines for, and always has, for Chuck (Charlie). Charlie has a fiance and a new life in California, however. It quickly becomes obvious, that as children, they engaged in activity of romantic and sexual nature. And THIS is where I really want to jump in and get away from the film itself.

As human beings, we tend to want to label, box everything in, etc. How many times have I spoken of this? What this movie brings to light, is how you cannot really flat out label someone fully as gay, bisexual, what have you, simply for certain ways they have lived, things they have done. Charlie was the older, slightly dominant one. You can tell, that Buck, poor Buck, was the highly sensitive, malleable, and vulnerable child, probably dominated by his mother, the mama’s boy. When Buck are Charlie finally confront each other, after loooong and looming avoidance of their childhood past, it becomes evident that Charlie, being older, instigated their sexual activity together as little boys. There are many things sad here. Sadly, many people do not seem to get the concept of love-deprivation, and there are many factors at play in this movie, bringing things to light, whether that was the writer’s (who plays Buck by the way) intention or not. Charlie, was probably a completely love-starved boy, whose parents didn’t pay much attention to him, OR, may have just been a more selfish creature (also due to love-deprivation), but spoiled, and of course, deep down inside, as we all do, felt unloved. And I feel, that this is why he would have chosen Buck as his closest friend. If you picture the character of Buck as a child, thinking already that he is sweet as an adult, you’ll probably think: blonde, sweet, soft, etc… And he, being this way, and having the older Charlie in his presence, most likely subconsciously tried to escape the suffocating effects of his mother/ parents, etc. So, he looked up to Charlie in more ways than one: he was an escape, and on top of that, coming from Buck’s end, thinking of what he had in terms of family at home, was even just a PHYSICALLY comforting presence for Buck. So for both characters, being male and best friends, there is also this distorted vision of one another, when it comes to comfort. I am in no way stating that homosexual behavior is wrong; what I am stating is, both children’s need for it and actually engaging in it as children, is rather distorted and leaves me with a sadness. The greatest sadness here, is that Charlie does not wish to acknowledge what he has been in Buck (who continues to look up to him and pine for him, even in adulthood)’s life. Resolution and some sort of peace come when the 2 finally make love as adults, but Charlie refuses to stay with Buck the night.

In the person of Buck, one does not know fully who, what and where he is. We do not know fully what he is molded into. All we see in the film, is his longing for Charlie. And Charlie, is either, gay, bi, or neither. Perhaps he simply needed affirmation as a child, and this is how it occurred. The same goes for Buck. Buck still yearns for him, but we never really know if Charlie is just cold and cruel, (selfish as I mentioned earlier on), and is more content to make money and live a life that “looks” normal. After seeing the film, I always felt that Buck was merely blinded by Charlie, and had nothing but Chuck in his eyes. There really is no way of concluding if Buck himself is gay, or if he just has had a life-long fixation with this one person, who happens to be male, and does not understand, and feel fully, what love is, what the sexual experience and attraction is for, meant for, and about. How sad to not know what love is, it’s true nature, and to “love” and chase someone, who shows no signs of knowing it themselves.

Another film I wish to review later is Mosquita and Mari. Stay tuned.