A Young Person

I know a man my age who, after being with a woman for 2 years, grew close to her infant son, and also impregnanted her. This ended their relationship. He told her to get an abortion if she wanted to stay with him. This young man is Dominican. He talks his mouth off all the time about the things that bother him, the smallest of things are a trigger. Where are Planned Parenthoods usually located? In poor neighborhoods. He is from the Bronx. There are many layers here. He is mentally unstable, you’d know if you ever spent the day working with him and hearing his incessant complaints on life. He believes there’s a system that’s trying to get him. He’s leaving in a few days for California to live on the streets, be a musician, and “find himself”. The system already got him. He’s poor, he’s Hispanic, he really is a father, due to the fact that he created something to be aborted (a cleaner term for destroying or killing). He destroyed his child, and his relationship. Now he hunts for “females” as he calls them, chases after them. Speaks belittling of their genitals and what he wants to do with them. The system got him a bunch of times, rooted in his abortion. She was enslaved to him, because of love-deprivation; she let him take her sexually, while rejecting her own natural reproductive cells, as well as his. She had an abortion to try to keep him. He was enslaved to her due to love-deprivation, wanting to fuck her in their unwed relationship, not caring about the consequences of their sex, sleeping with her in order to feel affirmed and accepted by her in a way that people falsely view as “the ultimate way to come together”. Enslavement to one another is an aspect of abortion. I’ve said it already. Who got who? Is he free? Is she?

Parents… You can’t be born without them!

It’s the typical scenario:  My children drive me crazy!  A frazzled mother, seemingly helpless against warring children.  But if you look more closely, chances are you’ll find a mother, or a mother and father, very neurotic in nature, engaging in behaviors towards their small children, that already by say, age 3, are already making the small children panicky, restless, nervous, unsettled little critters, unable to be at peace.  It’s demonstrated by parents in a number of ways, such as flipping out LITERALLY over some milk that was spilled on the table.  Or, the desire to constantly have to be moving, cleaning the family home and not letting your children near you in the process.  I recently had a discussion with a friend over homosexuality, and the church’s stance on it: while they are unable to separate weird, kinky sexual acts from homosexual acts, this is IN FACT what they must do, and what is hindering them, from ever seeing homosexuality as something natural.  Within both the heterosexual and homosexual sphere, there is the ability to engage in “traditional sexual acts”, that are not skewed, weird, or anything.  My friend said to me, well what if both persons involved want to engage in something kinky?  The answer is simple:  it means that both persons have a skewed vision of personhood, what they are together for, and what the sexual act between the 2 of them means: for them, it is something fun and experimental, which is the very opposite of being loving.  Now, this being the case, imagine how that would effect these 2 persons’ children.  So NOW, if you have 2 people who are in a co-dependent marriage, and cling to each other, even though they are a poor fit for each other, how do you think that will effect the children born of such a marriage?  I experience this first-hand through my own parents.  They are co-dependent, and so there love for each other is skewed, and thus, not only can they not love each other fully and healthily, but how can they love me in such a way?  That is why I do not feel loved by my parents, even though I know intellectually that they love me.  I know the type of people my parents are, so the sexual aspect isn’t a concern, but imagine the effects that this along with kinkiness would have on me and how I view myself and others.  So, if co-dependency alone can affect a child, think of the effect that weird sexual acts would have on children.  And that is that.  Thanks for reading, as always!

On The Vice

Mike Pence is a conversion therapy believer nut-job who needs to be out of office. I don’t even know how someone can hold such a distant non-conventional belief, and be allowed to hold office. Before pro-creation, you must be in love, and therefore the sole purpose of marriage is NOT pro-creation. It comes in steps. The idea is, you are in love, and thus you wish to marry, and then you are open to pro-creation, and create life together. If you cannot conceive on your own, hopefully the couple is open to adoption. And, gay couples can be adopt, and it would be wonderful if they were one of the greatest proponents of adoption.

Whaaaaaaat? Huuuuuuuuh?

Most persons of nihilistic and stark persuasions are usually self-indulgent, self-involved, and well-to-do, identifying themselves with only one facet of their beings, as in the work they do, being an investment banker, as their greatest asset and accomplishment. If we have many facets by which we can be identified, then there must also be a main, central to us all, which gives life meaning. A ha!

That Gilmore Thang

no-coffee

 

Oh God, the reboot!  May I just talk about this before I go to bed?  10 years later have taught me just how annoying fast-paced seemingly witty banter, super-charged by coffee, really is.  Dear God was my first impression as episode 1 opened up.  Incessant remarks on how “Gee, what a great kid you’ve got there!”, as in Rory.  Now, 10 years ago, who one and only true beau, wanted her to move out with him to California, start a life together, and be married.  Rory turned him down for The New York Times, and Logan said, well, this is the end, then.  So, you’d think he actually has some sensitivity and desire for a put-together, life of love.  You’d think.  He loved her.  Truly.

Then, fast forward 10 years and you find a whole new world.  You find that 10 years have not brought growth, but rather a regression.  They have a secret love affair, whilst Rory, now living in Lpondon, maintains a boyfriend in the States.  “What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas until you leave Vegas and forget about what happened, only to return to Vegas and remember again”, Rory states.  So, a regression in love and being loving?  The 2, once destined for marriage, make love less in their exploits, they lessen love.  Loveless.  And, this is all in episode 1.  I opened episode 2, and I shall have to leave it there.  This show was once rated as the top positive influential show for teens.  No longer.  Goodbye Gilmores, ’twas nice naively knowing you 10 years ago.  no-coffee

Bigotry? Blessed be the great Mother of God, Mary most Holy.

Yes, part of the title has nothing to do with this piece.  And, this is what I’ve noticed.  So, today I noticed that 2 of my FB friends had posted articles and commentary re the bigotry of and that is, Donald Trump.  You see, the thing is, I have never feared his bigotry because, well, I’ve never felt he was a bigot!  Before he came to run for office, he was just seen by people as a loud-mouthed, uncouth, unrefined, uncultured imbecile, and dang nabbit, that’s the impression of him that I’m sticking with.  At least, this is what I thought people thought of him mostly.  I say this because it seems that a seed of bigotry pertaining to him has been planted amongst folks.  But, maybe I’m wrong, perhaps people didn’t share the same view that I’ve always had of him.  There is something that wants to divide our country in half, tear it to shreds, and it is not Trump, I assure you of that.  It is the idleness of mind.  You see, the idea that he is a bigot, creating this entity, this sculpted piece of art of Trump as bigot, is the result of people believing there is nothing else to worry about in our society, and that the prevailing problem is racism and all that that entails.  It is akin to the individualist psychological struggle that so many people live with that is, you HAVE real, deep, wounding issues, but subconsciously you will never acknowledge and accept them, and therefore never deal with them, and so, you feel that you have no problems, and because of that, you have to CREATE other problems.  Such as, you walked into your kitchen only to find there was water all over the floor, and suddenly like rapid-fire, a succession of FUCKS come flying out of your mouth, because THAT is your biggest problem, because your true problems are buried deep down inside of you and trapped, and stuck in the back of your broken mind.  And so, I urge you to try and look at the concept of his supposed bigotry in this manner.  Of course, those who walk the tight ropes for a particular side will be the ones who continually have the “other” problems of our society buried deep inside their souls, in their broken brains, denying they exist or even are a problem: the horror of abortion, eugenics, the denial of rights to LGBT persons, euthanasia, God being evil, etc.  And that’s a wrap.

Daft Election, Punk. Hubris. Hillary’s Loss Smacks Down Your Supposed White Privilege.

At the end of the day, I could not vote for someone who has a well-groomed brain but would use it to impose evil on the world, and someone who is brainless.  Regardless of the outcome, we’ll always have Christ’s presence in the Eucharist. The ultimate “president”.  Because of the left’s lust for all types of sexual ease and pleasure, and thus the desire for abortion so strongly, we now have a sexual deviant headed for the White House.  I’m so confused. Why do all the white well-to-do intellectuals vote Hillary again? Is it because she’s for the poor and downtrodden?  I don’t understand minorities, if that’s what you want to call them. Abortion clinics are in poor areas, because they want to destroy them. Current economic policies are hurting the middle class; 20 years ago Bill said that we are now an intellectual economy. They don’t understand that not everyone is going to be an intellectual, or an internet startup etc. Overall, this is an attack against the Catholic Church because it is the main church that will never yield to accepting abortion and contraception, which is what liberals want.  The Roman Catholic Church has the most educational institutions and hospitals, throughout the world.

The lyrics of Jay Z can’t even be called animalistic, because animals are about survival and instinct. His lyrics are the most debasing and degrading towards women, and yet Hillary gets up on stage with him.

Leftists, Hillary’s loss smacks down your supposed white privilege, does it not?  She was the embodiment of it.

Hubris.

You pothead

I’ve been thinking again.  You know how I know that towns like New Paltz, ablaze with spots to purchase pot-smoking thingies, and people who smoke pot who want it to be legal so bad are a bunch of whiny babies with no true concerns or worries?  I know it because THAT is what they worry about, their right to smoke pot; THAT.  They could never delve deep enough to think such things or feel such things that, the 3 miscarriages their mother had, means they actually do have 3 siblings.  That’s just the type of folk they are; they could never FEEL that.  They want this stuff for recreation.  The key word in the case for pot is recreation as it actually implies dependency and addiction.  You see ads for it, their need for its affirmation and for it to be legal, on Viceland, etc.  I “do drugs”, the one my doctor prescribes for me for my depression and anxiety, and my body is dependent on them and addicted now; I don’t take these drugs for recreation.  Just as tobacco is a plant, perhaps it too should be outlawed.  My thinking goes, regarding the case for marijuana, there are simply far too many variants to deem it safe.  You have the person who gets so high, that they drive and get into an accident; they’re the ones who usually speak with the tone of “hey, man…”.  Their brains are fried and they just sound incomplete when they speak, even when not high.  Then, there are those who are not affected by it at all.  And then, of course there are those who want it for recreation because they NEED it because they ARE addicted to it.  We could say, let’s band cigars and cigarettes too, even though that shit is just a fellow plant, because there are too many variants as well, as to what could happen to a person.  Some people smoke their whole lives, and nothing happens.  Some get cancer.  What a thing, you pothead, you.

I Think Back To 1986

I Think Back To 1986 (To my parents)

Wander the college greens
Do not think of me
Focus on your studies.

Do not think of him
Do not think of her
Do not follow this whim
Only think on what will be conferred.

Sit in your class
Do your math
Don’t look at him
Don’t cross paths.

Don’t do it, don’t do it
I probably yelled from above
From the dreamy skies
That made for your hub of love.

But I want to live
I want to be here
So perhaps live it out, just a little bit
I want to live!

I want to live!

Fashion, Theatre, People, Feelings

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of visiting the Metropolitan Museum of Art and visiting both the Vigee LeBrun exhibition, the female 18th century French painter, as well as the Manus + Machina exhibition.  What I will mention here more so, is the latter.

The purpose of Manus + Machina is essentially to show the juxtaposition between what clothing can be when handmade, versus when made by by machine.  It can even become a machine, who knew!  I came away from the exhibition with the knowledge of a dress that puts YOU on, a dress that is remote-controlled to reveal its frilly backside, and a dress that goes up to your face and rather obstructs your vision.  The thought came to me that, you would have thought that in the era when it was not easy to mass produce, there would be… less.  Perhaps clothing would be more immodest, and in an era now of such richness, we would drape more, we have more at our disposal.  Yes, our present is so rich, and yet we do nothing but drag the person down, particularly women, when it comes to fashion.  We put them down with immodesty.  In steps theatre/film/media.

In fashion and in theatre, you cant ever really get to the core of anything, because it’s all the product of someone’s angst always and their own perspective, so it points to the fact that there is objective truth.  But someone will throw this at me and say to me who are you to define truth?  Well, the very nature of fashion, that all this stuff stems from someone’s angst and you can’t ever get to the root of anything.  ‘Tis why we go round and round in circles, watching the same things all the time, wearing the same things all the time.